Let us worry about your assignment instead!

We Helped With This Economics Assignment: Have A Similar One?

SOLVED
CategoryEconomics
SubjectOther
DifficultyUndergraduate
StatusSolved
More InfoEconomics Hw Help
228111

Short Assignment Requirements

Divergence between the 10-year Treasury Bond andthe S&P 500

Assignment Description

ECON 426 Project 6 – TNX SPX Divergence

CW

February 26, 2019

Project #6 – Divergence between the 10-year Treasury Bond and the S&P 500

Due: Monday March 4, 2019

It is a truism in macro-finance that when there is a divergence between S&P 500 stock prices and the 10-year

Treasury Bond yield, the bond market is always right. The presumption is that the stock market catches down (or up) to the bond market. That’s the “always right” portion of the statement.

In this project you are to test this hypothesis. Calculate divergences between the two securities, then see how long these divergences take to close. You need to make assumptions about what constitutes divergence and re-convergence (i.e., closure).

Give a summary – or better, distribution – of these closure times. You may want to do this for different time periods, and different divergence thresholds.

Finally, assess whether it’s bonds or stocks that are moving the most to converge each divergence.

In your write-up, before describing your methodology and results, please provide an explanation for why the hypothesized “bond market always right.” You don’t have to refer to any equity valuation theories, but you may.

What follows is some R code to do a decent chunk of the background work for you. It’s decently written, but not totally awesome. I’ve left out a bunch of plot labels and titles. Use this code, or not, as you wish. I’m posting the knitted version of this as a PDF, plus also the code as a .RMD (R-markdown) file.

If you DON’T know R, I’d suggest partnering with one or more people who do. If you have a particular request for a plot, etc. let me know and I’ll try to accommodate you. You can do a lot of this in Excel, actually, but then you’d be replicating work I’ve already done.

If you DO know R but need help with your code, let me know. Or ask Ken Z. or Cassie K. or Seth U. to help you – it’d be good for them.

library(tidyquant) library(gridExtra)

library(scales) # to access breaks/formatting functions

Get stock pairs

Here I import the U.S. Treatury 10-year bond yield (symbol ˆTNX), and the S&P 500 tracking ETF (symbol SPY). I can’t easily import the actual S&P 500 index data, and don’t feel like trying.

stock_prices <- c("^TNX", "SPY") %>%

tq_get(get = "stock.prices", from = "2017-01-01", to = "2018-12-31") %>%

group_by(symbol)

You can see here that I’m importing data from the beginning of 2017 through 2018. You can change this as you wish. These are daily data by default. To look at them, run: .

Convert to daily returns

stock_pairs <- stock_prices %>%

tq_transmute(select                          = adjusted,

mutate_fun = periodReturn, period = "daily", type       = "log",

col_rename = "returns") %>%

spread(key = symbol, value = returns)

# Rename ^TNX to TNX names(stock_pairs)[2] <- "TNX"

Plot the relationship between SPY and ˆTNX. You don’t have to do this.

stock_pairs %>%

ggplot(aes(x = SPY, y = TNX)) +

geom_point(color = palette_light()[[1]], alpha = 0.5) + geom_smooth(method = "lm") + labs(title = "Visualizing Returns Relationship of Stock and Bond Returns") + theme_tq()

Visualizing Returns Relationship of Stock and Bond Returns

SPY

lm(TNX ~ SPY, data = stock_pairs) %>%

summary()

##

## Call:

## lm(formula = TNX ~ SPY, data = stock_pairs)

##

## Residuals:

##           Min         1Q           Median  3Q           Max ## -0.052041 -0.007874 -0.000353 0.008119 0.038733

##

## Coefficients:

##                                           Estimate Std. Error t value                          Pr(>|t|)

## (Intercept) 0.00009899 0.00057768                      0.171                         0.864

## SPY    0.45615455 0.07066178   6.455 0.000000000256 *** ## ---

## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

##

## Residual standard error: 0.01292 on 499 degrees of freedom

## Multiple R-squared: 0.07708,                                Adjusted R-squared: 0.07523

## F-statistic: 41.67 on 1 and 499 DF, p-value: 0.000000000256

regr_fun <- function(data) { coef(lm(TNX ~ SPY, data = timetk::tk_tbl(data, silent = TRUE)))

}

stock_pairs <- stock_pairs %>% tq_mutate(mutate_fun = rollapply,

width = 90, FUN = regr_fun,

by.column = FALSE,

col_rename = c("coef.0", "coef.1"))

stock_pairs %>%

ggplot(aes(x = date, y = coef.1)) +

geom_line(size = 1, color = palette_light()[[1]]) +

geom_hline(yintercept = 0.6138327, size = 1, color = palette_light()[[2]]) + labs(title = "TNX ~ SPY: Visualizing Rolling Regression Coefficient", x = "") + theme_tq() -> plot1

Note that they actually are very poorly correlated over this date range. There’s a correlation of 0.376.

Indexing cumulative returns to a starting “wealth.index” value of 100

This is the more important part. I’m supposing that you purchase $100 of both securities at the beginning of the period under review, then am tracking cumulative return.

stock_prices %>% tq_transmute(adjusted,

periodReturn, period = "daily", type = "log",

col_rename = "returns") %>%

mutate(wealth.index = 100 * cumprod(1 + returns)) %>% ggplot(aes(x = date, y = wealth.index, color = symbol)) + geom_line(size = 1) + labs(title = "TNX and SPY: Bond Yield vs. Stock Prices") + theme_tq() +

scale_color_tq() -> plot2 grid.arrange(plot1, plot2, ncol = 1)

## Warning: Removed 89 rows containing missing values (geom_path).

TNX ~ SPY: Visualizing Rolling Regression Coefficient

TNX and SPY: Bond Yield vs. Stock Prices

                                                                                  symbol   ^TNX     SPY

On the bottom panel you can see how the values of the two holdings vary over time. This are cumulative returns. Now I calculate the daily divergence between SPY and TNX returns; positive means SPY returns are larger (more positive).

stock_pairs$diverge <- (stock_pairs$SPY - stock_pairs$TNX)

# Calculating the rolling sum of the divergence between the two securities.

stock_pairs <- stock_pairs %>%

        tq_mutate(select                 = diverge,

mutate_fun = rollapply,

width = 30, FUN = sum,

by.column = FALSE, col_rename = c("divergence"))

Plotting the Divergence

stock_pairs %>% ggplot(aes(x=date,y=divergence)) + geom_line(size=1, color = "purple") + theme_tq() + scale_color_tq() + scale_x_date(date_breaks = "3 months", date_labels = plot3

"%b %y") -> plot3

## Warning: Removed 29 rows containing missing values (geom_path).

                             Feb 17        May 17         Aug 17

Nov 17   Feb 18 date

May 18

Aug 18

Nov 18

Feb 1

grid.arrange(plot2, plot3, ncol = 1)

 

 

 

 

 

## Warning: Removed 29 rows containing missing values (geom_path).

TNX and SPY: Bond Yield vs. Stock Prices

Identifying the divergences and closures

Here you need to identify your threshold for what constitutes a divergence, and then a convergence. If you take a divergence to be 10% and consider it closed once the divergence gets back to 0%, then you can identify the first divergence/closure from the 2nd panel of the above plot.

In this case, June 30, 2017 is when it closes.

stock_pairs[120:200,]

## # A tibble: 81 x 7

##          date                            TNX                SPY                  coef.0 coef.1 diverge divergence

##          <date>                    <dbl>             <dbl>                <dbl> <dbl>             <dbl>                <dbl>

## 1 2017-06-23 -0.00419 0.00119 -0.00245                                    1.62 0.00538

0.133

## 2 2017-06-26 -0.00327 0.000658 -0.00254

1.60 0.00393

0.111

## 3 2017-06-27 0.0281 -0.00809 -0.00178

1.39 -0.0362

0.0709

## 4 2017-06-28 0.0104                        0.00891 -0.00167

1.40 -0.00150

0.0664

## 5 2017-06-29 0.0205 -0.00883 -0.00117

1.26 -0.0293

0.00529

## 6 2017-06-30 0.0153                        0.00186 -0.00100

1.27 -0.0135

-0.00455

## 7 2017-07-03 0.0189                        0.00169 -0.000671

1.28 -0.0172

-0.0229

## 8 2017-07-05 -0.00513 0.00231 -0.000410

1.29 0.00744

-0.0165

## 9 2017-07-06 0.0153 -0.00919 -0.000297

1.15 -0.0245

-0.0296

## 10 2017-07-07 0.00966 0.00646 -0.000257

## # ... with 71 more rows

1.15 -0.00319

-0.0435

Graphically:

stock_pairs[120:200,] %>% ggplot(aes(x=date,y=divergence)) + geom_line(size=1, color = theme_tq() + scale_color_tq() + scale_x_date(date_breaks = "2 weeks", date_labels = plot3.1

"purple") +

"%d %b") -> plot3.

Next Steps

1.    Figure out how to automatically identify divergences/closures. This isn’t that hard.

2.    Figure out how long each divergence/closure episode lasts. This also isn’t hard, if you do the first part right.

3.    Calculate the probability of divergences closing within various time frames. Hint: plot distribution of divergence closure times.

4.    Change around the thresholds you’re using, or the date ranges, or both.

5.    (Part of the actual assignment, but a bit harder) Identify the manner in which divergences are closed – does SPY move to match back up with the ˆTNX cumulative return, or vice versa? It’d usually be a combination of both.

6.    (Completely optional, but fun) Ignoring trading commissions and slippage, calculate your average annual return from putting on this divergence trade. At the start of the divergence go long ˆTNX (or short the corresponding T-bond ETF, or long the corresponding inverse T-bond ETF) and short the SPY. Or do the reverse if it’s the bond cumulative return that’s below the SPY cumulative return. Be clear about whether you are reinvesting your proceeds or not. [Note: this is a little bit of a trick question. Think about it before you do any fancy calculations.]

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it free to get my assignment evaluated?

Yes. No hidden fees. You pay for the solution only, and all the explanations about how to run it are included in the price. It takes up to 24 hours to get a quote from an expert. In some cases, we can help you faster if an expert is available, but you should always order in advance to avoid the risks. You can place a new order here.

How much does it cost?

The cost depends on many factors: how far away the deadline is, how hard/big the task is, if it is code only or a report, etc. We try to give rough estimates here, but it is just for orientation (in USD):

Regular homework$20 - $150
Advanced homework$100 - $300
Group project or a report$200 - $500
Mid-term or final project$200 - $800
Live exam help$100 - $300
Full thesis$1000 - $3000

How do I pay?

Credit card or PayPal. You don't need to create/have a Payal account in order to pay by a credit card. Paypal offers you "buyer's protection" in case of any issues.

Why do I need to pay in advance?

We have no way to request money after we send you the solution. PayPal works as a middleman, which protects you in case of any disputes, so you should feel safe paying using PayPal.

Do you do essays?

No, unless it is a data analysis essay or report. This is because essays are very personal and it is easy to see when they are written by another person. This is not the case with math and programming.

Why there are no discounts?

It is because we don't want to lie - in such services no discount can be set in advance because we set the price knowing that there is a discount. For example, if we wanted to ask for $100, we could tell that the price is $200 and because you are special, we can do a 50% discount. It is the way all scam websites operate. We set honest prices instead, so there is no need for fake discounts.

Do you do live tutoring?

No, it is simply not how we operate. How often do you meet a great programmer who is also a great speaker? Rarely. It is why we encourage our experts to write down explanations instead of having a live call. It is often enough to get you started - analyzing and running the solutions is a big part of learning.

What happens if I am not satisfied with the solution?

Another expert will review the task, and if your claim is reasonable - we refund the payment and often block the freelancer from our platform. Because we are so harsh with our experts - the ones working with us are very trustworthy to deliver high-quality assignment solutions on time.

Customer Feedback

"Thanks for explanations after the assignment was already completed... Emily is such a nice tutor! "

Order #13073

Find Us On

soc fb soc insta


Paypal supported